Date of test before radiation 7/4 and 16/4 1998. The first irradiation period 29/4 to 13/5 1998, the second irradiation period 17/6 to 8/7 1998 and the third period of test 5/8 to 21/9 1998
Dose rate of the period 1 (14 days) was 26Gy
(±25%) and neutrons (equiv. 1 MeV Si) was 2
1011 neutrons cm-2 (±50%
)
Dose rate of the period 2 (20 days) was 48
Gy (±25%) and neutrons (equiv.
1MeV Si) was 5 1011
neutrons cm-2 (±50% )
Dose rate of the period 3 (45 days) was 140Gy
(±25%)and neutrons (equiv. 1MeV Si) was 1.1
1012 neutrons cm-2 (±50%
).
Total dose rate for a period of 79 days was 214
Gy (±25%) and neutrons (equiv. 1MeV Si) was 1.8
1012 neutrons cm-2 (±50% )
For a general description of the tests and the test area TCC2,
see radtests.html
Below the detailed results are presented:
Philips lot-number: 64HAI J054Y
Description: Four circuits were tested in the test-box circuit. See Appendix 1
Test results:
Component PCA82C250 | Pulse Period (ns) (before irradiation) | Period (ns) after 1:st irrad | Period (ns) after 2:nd irrad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component PCA82C250 | Pulse Period (ns) (before irradiation) | Period (ns) after1:st irrad. | Period (ns) after 2:nd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component PCA82C250 | Pulse Period (ns) (before irradiation) | Period (ns) 1:st | Period (ns) 2:nd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens lot number: 9652Y
Description: Six circuits were tested in the test-box circuit.
Five of these were then subjected to radiation, while one was kept as reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
Results from the 1:st irradiation show a reduction of the current transfer
ratio of about 70% and there is one device (CH018) which does not fulfill
the specifications. The results from the 2:nd rad test show that the current
transfer ratios are reduced about 45% during the test. Only one of five
optocouplers is still working in the AC test for a RC =2.2k. After period
3 the RC was changed and therefore the optocouplers could be made working.
Conclusions: The mean value
of the current transfer ratio changed from 88 to 3.6%. With a change
of the gain of the circuit (the collector resistance RC was increased from
2.2 kohms to 35 kohm) it was found that the optocouplers were still functional!
Analog Devices lot number: 9722:
Description: Four circuits were tested in the test-box circuit.
One was kept as reference and the other three was irradiated.
Component ADM660 | Vout (V) before irradiation | Vout (V) after 1:st rad | Vout (V) after 2:nd rad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component ADM660 | Current (mA) before irradiation | Current (mA) after 1:st rad | Current (mA) after 2:nd rad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component ADM660 | Noise (mVpkpk) before the rad. | Noise (mVpkpk) after 1:st rad | Noise (mVpkpk) after 2:nd rad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description: Four circuits were tested in the test-box circuit.
|
Vout (V) before irradiation | Vout (V) after 1:st rad | Vout (V) after 2:nd rad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current (mA) before rad. | Current (mA) after 1:st rad | Current (mA) after 2:nd rad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noise (uVrms) before irradiation | Noise (uVrms)after 1:st rad | Noise (uVrms) after 2:nd rad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analog Devices lot number: AD 739 3301A 5
Description: Four circuits were tested in the test-box circuit.
The circuit is loaded with 48mA.
Component ADP3301 | Vout (V) before irradiation | Vout (V) after 1:st rad | Vout (V) after 2:nd rad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component ADP3301 | Current (mA) before irradiation | Current (mA) after 1:st rad | Current (mA) after 2:nd rad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component ADP3301 | Noise (uVrms) before irradiation | Noise (uVrms) after 1:st rad | Noise (uVrms) after 2:nd rad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results from measurements of the LMB before and after the 1:st radiaton:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: After the second irradiation the Pt100 part did not respond probably due to the reduced gain of the optocouplers! With another Pt100 module the response was normal! After the complete test period the CAN controller is still responding normally, while the ADC part is not probably due to the optocouplers.
Five ATMEL AT90S1200 RISC processors with flash memory and EEPROM
data storage were programmed with the same software: RAD98A.ROM and RAD98A.EEP.
The AT90S1200 has 64 bytes of EEPROM and 1024 bytes of flash PROM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusions: There was twice a memory location in the EEPROM
area which was erased. However this could be repgrammed and all chips are
functional after the complete test. The
EEPROM seems to be more sensitive than flash PROM.