FittedEnergyDensity < Main

Main Web>TWikiUsers>KristinLohwasser>FittedEnergyDensity (2007-02-17, KristinLohwasser)

Contents:

1.3.4.1 Energy Densities for the different weight tables

1.3.4.1 Energy Densities for the different weight tables

Here the first fits for the energy densities are presented. Some of the fits are clearly of - they shall be revied soon. The reason for that is mostly, that they contain only one layer of cells in eta... it seems, that there is some DOUBLE Gaussian involved then... (see HEC and EMEC e.g.)

1.3.4.1.1. EM Barrel

1.3.4.1.1.i) 1st sampling

EMB1	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	0<eta<0.2	0.000166043	99737.8 / 91
	0.2<eta<0.4	0.000160322	103592 / 93
	0.4<eta<0.6	0.000163408	108912 / 93
	0.6<eta<0.8	0.000153079	147469 / 93
	0.8<eta<1	0.000141764	161356 / 92
	1<eta<1.2	0.000126178	204444 / 93
	1.2<eta<1.4	0.000115541	222486 / 94
	1.4<eta<1.6	9.7042e-05	47089.5 / 80

1.3.4.1.1.ii) 2nd sampling

EMB2	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	0<eta<0.2	-6.86602e-05	113950 / 79
	0.2<eta<0.4	6.69831e-05	113908 / 80
	0.4<eta<0.6	OFF	403729 / 79
	0.6<eta<0.8	4.3489e-05	314323 / 80
	0.8<eta<1	6.05813e-05	196886 / 79
	1<eta<1.2	6.248e-05	223807 / 79
	1.2<eta<1.4	6.62006e-05	231660 / 80
	1.4<eta<1.6	0.000317886	11952.5 / 89

1.3.4.1.1.iii) 3rd sampling

EMB3	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	0<eta<0.2	-8.06083e-05	24967.5 / 80
	0.2<eta<0.4	-7.73682e-05	24203 / 80
	0.4<eta<0.6	-6.64944e-05	31280.8 / 80
	0.6<eta<0.8	5.6351e-05	52793.9 / 79
	0.8<eta<1	5.70652e-05	54539.8 / 79
	1<eta<1.2	6.068e-05	57736.4 / 78
	1.2<eta<1.4	-6.86127e-05	52785.2 / 81

1.3.4.1.2. EM Endcap

1.3.4.1.2.i) 1st sampling

EME1	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	1.4<eta<1.6	0.000213325	169824 / 86
	1.6<eta<1.8	0.000331345	199400 / 91
	1.8<eta<2	0.000384216	132548 / 92
	2<eta<2.2	0.000389011	119450 / 93
	2.2<eta<2.4	0.000642033	97856.1 / 97
	2.4<eta<2.6	0.000356822	36882.3 / 97

1.3.4.1.2.i a) Energy density for EME1, 2.4<eta<2.6

Here the fit clearly fails - and we see as clearly why: There seems to be some involvement of a double gaussian. If you have a look at the noise plots, you can get some idea of where it comes from: This eta bin contains only ONE cell layer (whereas the other contain several), so it indeed could be subject to some (noise?) fluctuactions, which would cancel each other out, if you take into account several cell layers... (maybe it is worth revising LAr noise in general for that particular case...) I shall write more on that, once I've figured out possible explanations for the doube gaussian... https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Main/NoiseStudies#1_3_4_2_1_EMEC_sampling_1

1.3.4.1.2.ii) 2nd sampling

EME2	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	1.4<eta<1.6	-6.83553e-05	221128 / 80
	1.6<eta<1.8	-9.49612e-05	223981 / 81
	1.8<eta<2	-0.000154235	211508 / 83
	2<eta<2.2	0.000247442	233939 / 87
	2.2<eta<2.4	0.000430333	220588 / 94
	2.4<eta<2.6	0.000550885	139405 / 97
	2.6<eta<2.8	-7.05269e-05	76449.5 / 79
	2.8<eta<3	9.50547e-05	83966.7 / 80
	3<eta<3.2	0.000144061	63519.9 / 82

1.3.4.1.2.ii a) More Double Gaussians

Here the same behaviour can be spotted: a small peak on top of a broad gaussian... For the other bins that come after that, no such behaviour can be seen, which is strange, as they have all a similar lack of cell layers.... BUT they do not cover the transition region, which might be in fact the problem? See the noise picture: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Main/NoiseStudies#1_3_4_2_2_EMEC_sampling_2

1.3.4.1.2.iii) 3rd sampling

EME3	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	1.4<eta<1.6	-8.67202e-05	33643.3 / 81
	1.6<eta<1.8	-0.000102117	76157.3 / 81
	1.8<eta<2	-0.000131849	89575.2 / 82
	2<eta<2.2	0.000164286	121646 / 83
	2.2<eta<2.4	0.000202346	151608 / 85
	2.4<eta<2.6	0.000212561	92475.1 / 86
	2.6<eta<2.8	-0.000123304	50373.2 / 81
	2.8<eta<3	-0.000142733	62349.3 / 82
	3<eta<3.2	-0.000183666	48400 / 83

1.3.4.1.3. HEC - Hadronic Endcap

1.3.4.1.3.i) 1st sampling

HEC0	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	1.4<eta<1.6	2.8052e-05	9219.54 / 70
	1.6<eta<1.8	2.97744e-05	22882.9 / 71
	1.8<eta<2	3.85975e-05	25968.1 / 74
	2<eta<2.2	5.43257e-05	30130 / 77
	2.2<eta<2.4	7.93338e-05	30099.6 / 83
	2.4<eta<2.6	9.7262e-05	13609.1 / 86
	2.6<eta<2.8	4.48238e-05	16846 / 73
	2.8<eta<3	6.07319e-05	15989 / 78
	3<eta<3.2	8.52088e-05	9870.84 / 83
	3.2<eta<3.4	0.000256166	1279.79 / 97

Here especially the last layer seems to be really disturbing....

1.3.4.1.3.i a) HEC0, last eta bin

1.3.4.1.3.ii) 2nd sampling

HEC1	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	1.4<eta<1.6	4.90761e-05	3778.97 / 75
	1.6<eta<1.8	2.11556e-05	14615.4 / 69
	1.8<eta<2	-2.52987e-05	17751.8 / 70
	2<eta<2.2	3.42745e-05	22661.8 / 72
	2.2<eta<2.4	4.93342e-05	25304.4 / 76
	2.4<eta<2.6	6.24789e-05	11574.7 / 78
	2.6<eta<2.8	2.99115e-05	11937.3 / 71
	2.8<eta<3	3.98924e-05	12553.7 / 73
	3<eta<3.2	8.33512e-05	7810.52 / 80

1.3.4.1.3.iii) 3rd sampling

HEC2	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	1.6<eta<1.8	5.00865e-05	6425.73 / 92
	1.8<eta<2	3.17808e-05	4798.35 / 72
	2<eta<2.2	4.0453e-05	6494.52 / 73
	2.2<eta<2.4	5.58868e-05	7346.2 / 78
	2.4<eta<2.6	7.03689e-05	3451.24 / 81
	2.6<eta<2.8	3.4715e-05	3371.93 / 72
	2.8<eta<3	4.57227e-05	4233.01 / 74
	3<eta<3.2	6.27498e-05	4757.09 / 79

1.3.4.1.3.iv) 4th sampling

HEC3	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	1.6<eta<1.8	8.06805e-05	250.166 / 72
	1.8<eta<2	2.958e-05	1247.65 / 71
	2<eta<2.2	3.71593e-05	1644.71 / 71
	2.2<eta<2.4	5.0891e-05	1848.63 / 76
	2.4<eta<2.6	6.28911e-05	959.55 / 79
	2.6<eta<2.8	3.22061e-05	873.382 / 66
	2.8<eta<3	4.09432e-05	1161.68 / 73
	3<eta<3.2	5.76166e-05	1859.89 / 76
	3.2<eta<3.4	0.000127041	938.829 / 89

1.3.4.1.4. Barrel and extended Tile

1.3.4.1.4.i) 1st sampling

TileExt0	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	0<eta<0.2	-1.69096e-06	31852.4 / 66
	0.2<eta<0.4	-1.63099e-06	32674.3 / 66
	0.4<eta<0.6	-1.5193e-06	32737.8 / 67
	0.6<eta<0.8	1.40707e-06	36283.9 / 67
	0.8<eta<1	-1.33059e-06	43457.8 / 66
	1<eta<1.2	2.3147e-06	25132.7 / 68
	1.2<eta<1.4	-9.99503e-07	66021.9 / 65
	1.4<eta<1.6	7.23052e-07	39325.8 / 64

1.3.4.1.4.ii) 2nd sampling

TileExt1	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	0<eta<0.2	-5.21207e-07	24592.8 / 63
	0.2<eta<0.4	-5.03314e-07	24212.1 / 63
	0.4<eta<0.6	4.81897e-07	21048.5 / 63
	0.6<eta<0.8	4.49597e-07	19924.6 / 63
	0.8<eta<1	-9.14172e-07	10656.9 / 64
	1<eta<1.2	6.59984e-07	38688.4 / 64
	1.2<eta<1.4	2.62891e-07	36334.4 / 63
	1.4<eta<1.6	OFF	4436.28 / 62

NB: Last fit is obviously OFF...

1.3.4.1.4.iii) 3rd sampling

TileExt2	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	0<eta<0.2	6.08575e-06	2219.95 / 62
	0.2<eta<0.4	6.1499e-06	4439.02 / 62
	0.4<eta<0.6	6.05371e-06	3631.32 / 62
	0.6<eta<0.8	3.91866e-06	2534.76 / 62
	1<eta<1.2	6.70377e-06	5806.29 / 62
	1.2<eta<1.4	4.81504e-06	1358.23 / 58

1.3.4.1.5. FCAL

1.3.4.1.5.i) 1st sampling

FCAL0	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	3<eta<3.2	0.00289012	8528.76 / 97
	3.2<eta<3.4	-0.00189022	13979 / 94
	3.4<eta<3.6	-0.00188665	9399.85 / 94
	3.6<eta<3.8	-0.00185024	6374.65 / 94
	3.8<eta<4	-0.00188145	3326.48 / 93
	4<eta<4.2	-0.00187692	3246.22 / 94
	4.2<eta<4.4	0.00313855	3043.85 / 97
	4.4<eta<4.6	-0.00375307	2973.89 / 97
	4.6<eta<4.8	0.00381931	1436.34 / 97
	4.8<eta<5	0.00379463	229.153 / 69

1.3.4.1.5.ii) 2nd sampling

FCAL1	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	3<eta<3.2	0.00319154	39.3743 / 29
	3.2<eta<3.4	0.00195965	6912.4 / 97
	3.4<eta<3.6	-0.00166943	5637.94 / 93
	3.6<eta<3.8	-0.00165845	4395.28 / 93
	3.8<eta<4	0.00167612	2776.41 / 93
	4<eta<4.2	0.00167364	1686.01 / 93
	4.2<eta<4.4	0.00174075	2133.02 / 92
	4.4<eta<4.6	0.00273239	1721.49 / 95
	4.6<eta<4.8	0.00357444	1465.28 / 94
	4.8<eta<5	-0.00380013	171.085 / 62

1.3.4.1.5.iii) 3rd sampling

FCAL2	eta	sigma	Chi^2 / ndf
	3.2<eta<3.4	0.00105332	736.847 / 53
	3.4<eta<3.6	0.000944005	1145.25 / 64
	3.6<eta<3.8	0.000971715	1027.67 / 62
	3.8<eta<4	0.000956986	582.867 / 49
	4<eta<4.2	0.000988201	589.694 / 53
	4.2<eta<4.4	0.000992826	298.727 / 55
	4.4<eta<4.6	-0.00125261	631.207 / 65
	4.6<eta<4.8	0.00202323	404.875 / 60

-- Main.kristin - 16 Feb 2007

Attachments

Topic attachments
I	Attachment	History	Action	Size	Date	Who
jpg	EDFits_EMB2.jpg	r1	manage	44.0 K	2007-02-17 - 14:24	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_EMB3.jpg	r1	manage	44.3 K	2007-02-17 - 14:24	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_EME1.jpg	r1	manage	45.1 K	2007-02-17 - 14:25	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_EME2.jpg	r1	manage	50.2 K	2007-02-17 - 14:33	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_EME3.jpg	r1	manage	50.1 K	2007-02-17 - 14:38	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_FCAL0.jpg	r1	manage	55.6 K	2007-02-17 - 14:58	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_FCAL1.jpg	r1	manage	57.3 K	2007-02-17 - 14:59	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_FCAL2.jpg	r1	manage	49.3 K	2007-02-17 - 14:59	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_HEC0.jpg	r1	manage	51.4 K	2007-02-17 - 14:39	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_HEC1.jpg	r1	manage	48.8 K	2007-02-17 - 14:54	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_HEC2.jpg	r1	manage	45.2 K	2007-02-17 - 14:55	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_HEC3.jpg	r1	manage	51.8 K	2007-02-17 - 14:56	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_TileExt0.jpg	r1	manage	41.4 K	2007-02-17 - 14:56	UnknownUser
jpg	EDFits_TileExt1.jpg	r1	manage	42.3 K	2007-02-17 - 14:57	UnknownUser
jpg	EMB1.jpg	r1	manage	44.3 K	2007-02-16 - 19:56	UnknownUser
jpg	EMB1_Noise.jpg	r1	manage	48.1 K	2007-02-16 - 19:55	UnknownUser
jpg	EnergyDensityFit_ieta_12_icalo_1_isamp_1.jpg	r1	manage	32.1 K	2007-02-17 - 14:27	UnknownUser
jpg	EnergyDensityFit_ieta_12_icalo_1_isamp_2.jpg	r1	manage	31.4 K	2007-02-17 - 14:35	UnknownUser
jpg	EnergyDensityFit_ieta_16_icalo_2_isamp_0_a.jpg	r1	manage	27.0 K	2007-02-17 - 14:53	UnknownUser

Topic revision: r4 - 2007-02-17 - KristinLohwasser

Main

Webs

Public webs

Welcome Guest

- Cern Search
- TWiki Search
- Google Search
Main All webs

Copyright &© 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback