Data Sets
Run Range |
Data Set |
Trigger |
JSON |
138564-139459, 140160-140401 |
EG_Run2010A-PromptReco-v4 |
Photon15_Cleaned_L1R |
subset of:Cert_132440-144114_7TeV_StreamExpress_Collisions10_JSON_v2.txt |
139779-140159 |
EG_Run2010A-Jul16thReReco |
Photon15_Cleaned_L1R |
Cert_139779-140159_7TeV_ July16thReReco_Collisions10_JSON.txt |
141956-144114 |
EG_Run2010A-PromptReco-v4 |
Ele15_SW_CaloEleId_L1R |
subset of:Cert_132440-144114_7TeV_StreamExpress_Collisions10_JSON_v2.txt |
Tag Selection
Tag electrons are selected using tight criteria. We use two different "Tag" definitions, i.e.
WP80_Tag and
WP95_Tag. The conditions are defined below:
- WP80_Tag
- Should be gsfElectron with supercluster |η| < 2.5, and et > 10 GeV.
- Should have hadronicOverEm fraction < 0.15.
- Should pass combined relative isolation criteria:
- Barrel: combRelIso <0.07
- Endcap: combRelIso <0.06
- Should pass electron Identification Criteria:
- Barrel: MissingHits ≤ 0, σiηiη<0.01, |Δ&phi|<0.06, |Δη|<0.004, HoE <0.04.
- Endcap: MissingHits ≤ 0, σiηiη<0.03, |Δ&phi|<0.03, HoE<0.025.
- Shoud Pass the HLT path of our interest
- WP95_Tag
- Should be gsfElectron with supercluster |η| < 2.5, and et > 10 GeV.
- Should have hadronicOverEm fraction < 0.15.
- Should pass combined relative isolation criteria:
- Barrel: combRelIso <0.15
- Endcap: combRelIso <0.1
- Should pass electron Identification Criteria:
- Barrel: MissingHits ≤ 1, σiηiη<0.01, |Δ&phi|<0.08, |Δη|<0.007, HoE<0.15.
- Endcap: MissingHits ≤ 1, σiηiη<0.03, |Δ&phi|<0.07, HoE<0.07.
- Shoud Pass the HLT path of our interest
Probe Selection
- To obtain the denominator for the efficiency calculation, we use a probe collection (also called "AllProbes" collection) defined as follows:
- All Probes
- AllProbes_WP95 : Same as "WP95_Tag", but HLT conditions not applied.
- AllProbes_WP80 : Same as "WP80_Tag", but HLT conditions not applied.
- To obtain the numerator for the efficiency calculation, we have to define "passingProbes" and "failingProbes".
- passing Probes
- WP95 : Subset of the AllProbes_WP95 which PASS HLT conditions.
- WP80 : Subset of the AllProbes_WP80 which PASS HLT conditions.
- failingProbes
- WP95 : Subset of the AllProbes_WP95 which FAIL HLT conditions.
- WP80 : Subset of the AllProbes_WP80 which FAIL HLT conditions.
Variables and Binning
Variables used for plotting are gsfElectrons_Pt, SC_Et, SC_Eta with binning as:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pt/Et binned in (0,10,15,20,25,40,60,120)
|Eta| binned in (0,1.5,2.5)
Eta binned in (-2.5, -2.0, -1.5, -1.0, -0.5, 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here, I am showing efficiency in the bins of Et and Eta (taken from likelihood fit of Z mass).
Efficiency For HLT_Photon15_Cleaned_L1R
Efficiency For HLT_Ele15_SW_CaloEleId_L1R
Tabulated values for efficiencies
WP80
Trigger Name |
Barrel |
Endcap |
SC Et Range |
20-25 |
25-60 |
60-120 |
20-25 |
25-60 |
60-120 |
HLT_Ele15_SW_CaloEleId_L1R |
0.979 ± 0.021 |
0.989 ± 0.003 |
1 ± 0.026 |
1 ± 0.035 |
0.99 ± 0.006 |
1 ± 0.052 |
HLT_Photon15_Cleaned_L1R |
1 ± 0.185 |
0.989 ± 0.010 |
1 ± 0.241 |
1 ± 0.023 |
1 ± 0.027 |
---- |
WP95
Trigger Name |
Barrel |
Endcap |
SC Et Range |
20-25 |
25-60 |
60-120 |
20-25 |
25-60 |
60-120 |
HLT_Ele15_SW_CaloEleId_L1R |
0.988 ± 0.012 |
0.987 ± 0.003 |
0.982 ± 0.018 |
1 ± 0.020 |
0.986 ± 0.009 |
1 ± 0.044 |
HLT_Photon15_Cleaned_L1R |
1 ± 0.103 |
0.992 ± 0.008 |
1 ± 0.137 |
1 ± 0.184 |
1 ± 0.021 |
1 ± 0.421 |
Conclusions
- Used the official tag and probe software to obtain the electron trigger efficiency.
- We observed that the results for the both the paths studied are statistically consistent.
- We want to confirm that the results won't change much, if we take OR of both the paths to define the passing/failing probe collections. Still we are working on it.
--
LovedeepKaurSaini - 05-Oct-2010