TagAndProbe
main page and also documentation page for TagProbeFitTreeProducer
. The aim is to obtain data driven efficiency of electron (muon) reco/selection. For electrons the overall reco+selection efficiency has been factorized as follows: SuperClusterToPfElectron
SC->PFlow (ID)
PfToId
tagPtEta
patElecPtEta
patElecPtEtaLvdp2012Id
IdToIso
tagPtEtaId
patElecPtEtaLvdp2012Id
patElecLvdp2012
WP80ToHLTEle17
(misleading nomenclature: will be changed) tagPtEtaIdIso
patElecLvdp2012
patElecPassingEle17Hlt
WP80ToHLTEle8NotEle17
tagPtEtaIdIso
patElecLvdp2012
patElecPassingEle8NotEle17Hlt
(having Ele8
trigger match but not Ele17
)
FSR Effect
: GsfElectrons
primarily for luminosity bussiness. Separate jobs submitted for following time bins: Run2011A-May10ReReco-v1
Run2011A-PromptReco-v4
Run2011A-05Aug2011-v1
Run2011A-PromptReco-v6
Run2011B-PromptReco-v1
ScToGsf
effi comparison in barrel, effi comparison in endcap, FIT CANVAS
GsfToId
effi comparison in barrel, effi comparison in endcap, FIT CANVAS
IdToIso
effi comparison in barrel, effi comparison in endcap, FIT CANVAS
IsoToEle17
effi comparison in barrel, effi comparison in endcap, FIT CANVAS
GsfElectrons
primarily for luminosity bussiness. Separate jobs submitted for following time bins: Run2011A-May10ReReco-v1
|
Run2011A-PromptReco-v4
|
Run2011A-05Aug2011-v1
|
Run2011A-PromptReco-v6
|
Run2011B-PromptReco-v1
Electrons
for the analysis. For use in the analysis, we factorize the efficiency as follows: ScToPFlow
PFlowToWP
WPToTrig
SC
probe is poorer than the one selected using an GsfElectron
probe.
|
|
|
|
|
allProbes
and passing_probes
. So here is my recipe for a working configuration:
eleCollection = cms.EDProducer( 'MyCustomElectronSelector', patElectrons_ = cms.InputTag("patElectronsPFlow"), cuts = +myTightSelection+ ) eleRefCollection = cms.EDProducer( 'MyCustomElectronRefSelector', patElectrons_ = cms.InputTag("patElectronsPFlow"), cuts = +myBasicProbeSelection+ ) passEleRefCollection = cms.EDProducer( 'MyCustomElectronRefSelector', patElectrons_ = cms.InputTag("patElectronsPFlow"), cuts = +myPassProbeSelection+ ) tpPair = cms.EDProducer( "CandViewShallowCloneCombiner", decay = cms.string("eleCollection eleRefCollection"), checkCharge = cms.bool(False), cut = cms.string("60 < mass < 120") ) tpTree = cms.EDAnalyzer( "TagProbeFitTreeProducer", mcTruthCommonStuff, CommonStuffForGsfElectronProbe, tagProbePairs = cms.InputTag("tpPair"), arbitration = cms.string("Random2"), flags = cms.PSet( probe_passing = cms.InputTag("passEleRefCollection") ), probeMatches = cms.InputTag("McMatchPtExa"), allProbes = cms.InputTag("eleRefCollection") ) process.p = cms.Path( process.eleCollection +process.eleRefCollection +process.passEleRefCollection +process.tpPair +process.tpTree )Another constant problem for me is the job submission at condor. Here is one successful command:
farmoutAnalysisJobs --save-failed-datafiles --input-files-per-job=1 --input-dbs-path=/DYJetsToLL_TuneZ2_M-50_7TeV-madgraph-tauola/Fall11-PU_S6_START44_V9B-v1/AODSIM newElePF2PAT_DYJets_Mar2 ~/exercise06/CMSSW_4_4_2/ ~/exercise06/CMSSW_4_4_2/src/PhysicsTools/PatAlgos/test/newPF2PAT.py
|
|
|
Sc->Gsf
and Gsf->PFlow
tables give numbers consistent with Sc->PFlow
table, more so in barrel region. Small discrepancies observed in endcap might probably be due to the smaller statistics in doing Gsf->PFlow
step. A look at this [[][note]] indicates that our numbers are consistent with them. Now the next step is to evaluate the efficiencies for the other steps i.e PFlow->Iso
, Iso->Trig
. Table (PFlow->Iso
, Iso->Trig
) from a limited number of successful jobs was reported yesterday and jobs are running again to obtain better calculation.
Now a special question: To what level are the efficiency of a step can be correlated to tag quality ? PileUp is factor that may induce correlations between Tag and Probe legs especially for isolation calculation. We plan following activity: Ele32Match
+ WPLvdp2011
Ele32Match
+ WP95
Ele32Match
+ WP75
Ele32Match
+ WP70
Ele32Match
+ WP60
|
|
|
SCToGsfElectron
goodSuperClustersClean
(defined above)
GsfMatchedScCandidates
GsfElectronToPF-Id
gsfElectrons
pfIdGsfElectrons
|
|
|
tnpCommonVars_cfi
, it contain definitions for basic cuts on =SuperCluster='s, =Electron='s and =Jet='s. We also define here the parameter sets for the trigger matching which has to come downstream. The file can be seen here.
tnpSupClusSel_cfi
and the probe collection is : PassingSC17HLTSC
. This acts as set of AllProbes
for the calculation of efficiencies in SC->PFlowElectron step. The SuperCluster
's are selected with a basic cuts of pt
>20 GeV and |η| within EcalAcceptance. This is done with the understanding that the effect of pt
and |&eta| cuts will be a part of acceptance calculation. The cfi
can be seen here.
patElecPtEta
, patElecPtEtaLvdp2012Id
, patElecPtEtaLvdp2012
(full sel with iso) and patElecPtEtaLvdp2012IdMjjIso
(our iso replaced by the detector based used in Mjj analysis). Since we want to be consistent with our main analysis chain, so we have imported PSet
definitions from main analysis:
from DelPanj.TreeMaker.eSelLvdp2012_cff import *The whole
cfi
can be seen here.
pdgId
= 11), these matches are stored in form of the value maps. This part of the configuration is used only for the case when we need to calculate the truth efficiency as well as TnP Efficiency. The cfi
file is here
patPFlowJets
and create valuemaps between the probe candidate and jet multiplicity. This is included if we need to calculate the efficiency as function of Jet multiplicity.
CandViewShallowCloneCombiner
is used to make tagAndProbe pairs. We always use patElecPassingEle32Hlt
as tag and the probe definitions are done with successively tighter selection. Here are the names: tagSC
patElecPassingEle32Hlt
goodSuperClustersClean
(SC17 Match+PtEtaCut)
tagPtEta
patElecPassingEle32Hlt
patElecPtEta
(SC17 Matched+PtEtaCut)
tagPtEtaId
patElecPassingEle32Hlt
patElecPtEtaLvdp2012Id
(SC17 Match+PtEtaCut+Id)
tagPtEtaIdIso
patElecPassingEle32Hlt
patElecLvdp2012
(SC17 Match+PtEtaCut+Id+Iso)
tnpSequences_cfi
. The cfi
can be seen here.
from PhysicsTools.TagAndProbe.tnpCommonVars_cfi import * process.load('PhysicsTools.TagAndProbe.tnpSequences_cfi') process.load("PhysicsTools.TagAndProbe.tnpPairs_cfi") process.load("PhysicsTools.TagAndProbe.tnpMcEleMatch_cfi")Use the predefined tag,probe collections and TnP Pairs to instantiate
TagProbeFitTreeProducer
which produces the TnP trees. We have following tree definitions: SuperClusterToPfElectron
PfToId
tagPtEta
patElecPtEta
patElecPtEtaLvdp2012Id
IdToIso
tagPtEtaId
patElecPtEtaLvdp2012Id
patElecLvdp2012
WP80ToHLTEle17
(misleading nomenclature: will be changed) tagPtEtaIdIso
patElecLvdp2012
patElecPassingEle17Hlt
WP80ToHLTEle8NotEle17
tagPtEtaIdIso
patElecLvdp2012
patElecPassingEle8NotEle17Hlt
(having Ele8
trigger match but not Ele17
)
beginRun
, check if all the paths given from cfg
have same process name: skipEvent_ = false; bool identical = true; std::vector<edm::InputTag>::const_iterator iMyHLT = hltTags_.begin(); edm::InputTag lastTag = *iMyHLT; while ((iMyHLT != hltTags_.end()) && identical) { if ((*iMyHLT).process() == lastTag.process()) identical = true; //compare n^th with (n-1)^th path else identical = false; lastTag = *iMyHLT; ++iMyHLT; } if (!identical) skipEvent_ = true; //If a path with unidentical process name is found, skip events.
beginRun
, Initialize the HLTConfigProvider
and throw exception if failure (it needs edm::Run
, edm::EventSetup
, HLTProcessNam
and a bool
). if(!hltConfig_.init(iRun,iSetup,hltTags_[0].process(),changed_) ){ edm::LogError("TriggerCandProducer") << "Error! Can't initialize HLTConfigProvider"; throw cms::Exception("HLTConfigProvider::init() returned non 0"); } if(printIndex_ && changed_) std::cout << "HLT configuration changed !" << std::endl;
produce
, access following collections: edm::View<object>
trigger::TriggerEvent
edm::TriggerResults
cmsrel CMSSW_3_9_4 cd CMSSW_3_9_4/src/ cmsenv cmscvsroot CMSSW cvs co -r V03-01-02 PhysicsTools/TagAndProbe cvs co -r V00-03-20 RecoEgamma/ElectronIdentification scram b -j4Since we need to configure this package for studying trigger efficiencies, some more checkouts are required. Use following recipe:
cvs co -d Scripts UserCode/Lovedeep/TnP/Scripts/ mv Scripts/* . ; rmdir ScriptsThis imports a script called "TnPJob.py". It's job is to read the standard configuration files (
Electron_TagProbeTreeProducer_cfg.py
and testTagProbeFitTreeAnalyzer_Zee.py
) and regenerate
python configuration (same file names as original ones but prefixed with the word New
) corresponding to the trigger paths of interest. For the user comfort we are also temporarily importing
mytestTagProbeFitTreeAnalyzer_Zee.py
to be used as (and in place of) testTagProbeFitTreeAnalyzer_Zee.py
. ( This import occurs during cvs co -d Scripts UserCode/Lovedeep/TnP/Scripts/
execution).
NewtestTagProbeFitTreeAnalyzer_Zee.py
) that will test the HLT paths of interest, run the script with,
./TnPJob.py -names HLT_Ele15_SW_CaloEleId_L1R HLT_Photon15_Cleaned_L1ROr if alternately, one wishes to study a large number of triggers, this script can be used in following way as well:
./TnPJob.py -file someFileName.txtWhere "someFileName.txt", is the name of flat text file containing names of the "interesting" trigger paths (one per row). For testing, one can specify one or more input data files in
NewElectron_TagProbeTreeProducer_cfg.py
in the fileNames
in PoolSource
.
To specify the data input, goto DBS: https://cmsweb.cern.ch/dbs_discovery/ , search for your data sets, and click on "sites" and find the site you're interested in and click "lfn". The list should be something like:
'/store/data/Run2010A/EG/RECO/v4/000/144/114/EEC21BFA-25B4-DF11-840A-001617DBD5AC.root', '/store/data/Run2010A/EG/RECO/v4/000/144/114/EEAA24FA-25B4-DF11-A5F1-000423D98950.root', '/store/data/Run2010A/EG/RECO/v4/000/144/114/C40EDB4E-1DB4-DF11-A83C-0030487C90C2.root', '/store/data/Run2010A/EG/RECO/v4/000/144/114/C2497931-2CB4-DF11-A92C-003048F1183E.root', '/store/data/Run2010A/EG/RECO/v4/000/144/114/AC68ABE0-19B4-DF11-BB93-0030487C7E18.root', '/store/data/Run2010A/EG/RECO/v4/000/144/114/92F10BD6-22B4-DF11-B5FC-0030487CD812.root', '/store/data/Run2010A/EG/RECO/v4/000/144/114/7ACE82CB-19B4-DF11-8D26-0030487C7828.root', '/store/data/Run2010A/EG/RECO/v4/000/144/114/72E4744F-1DB4-DF11-AE6F-0030487CD6F2.root', '/store/data/Run2010A/EG/RECO/v4/000/144/114/602C2073-1DB4-DF11-A7FB-0030487D05B0.root',Finally it is the time to run the job:
cmsRun NewElectron_TagProbeTreeProducer_cfg.pyA successful execution will give
testNewWrite.root
as output root file which contains tag and probe tree.
Efficiencies are now obtained by doing fits over the contents of the tree. To run fitting machinery do,
cmsRun NewtestTagProbeFitTreeAnalyzer_Zee.pyRunning above commands may take a while, final output is
testEff_YOUR_TRIGGER.root
. For paths used in this exercise, we get testEff_HLT_Ele15_SW_CaloEleId_L1R.root
and testEff_HLT_Photon15_Cleaned_L1R.root
. These output files contain the detailed plots for the trigger efficiencies, which can be retrieved and cosmetics be arranged using a file named PlotEffi.cxx
One may need to edit it according to the directory names in the final output rootfiles. For example, for the output file considered here as an example (testEff_HLT_Ele15_SW_CaloEleId_L1R.root
), we are interested in the plots stored in a directory called TreeHLTHLTEle15SWCaloEleIdL1R
, hence we edit PlotEffi.cxx
and change the TString basedir
from "IdToHLT"
to "TreeHLTHLTEle15SWCaloEleIdL1R"
. Then to use this macro, run following command on terminal:
root.exe -b -l -q testEffi*.root 'PlotEffi.cxx("data")'If one wishes to submit crab jobs to produce tag and probe tree,
source /afs/cern.ch/cms/LCG/LCG-2/UI/cms_ui_env.csh eval `scramv1 runtime -csh` source /afs/cern.ch/cms/ccs/wm/scripts/Crab/crab.csh voms-proxy-init -voms cms crab -create -submit -cfg CrabTnP.crabNote: One need to edit the
CrabTnP.crab
to suit his purpose.
PhysicsTools/TagAndProbe/src/TriggerCandProducer.icc
via adding some try-catches. We need to rebuild the package after these modifications. produce()
method of TriggerCandProducer
(near line#114,115)std::vector<std::string> filters = hltConfig_.moduleLabels( hltTag_.label() );, modify it with:
std::vector<std::string> filters; try{ filters = hltConfig_.moduleLabels( hltTag_.label() );} catch(...) {}
beginRun()
method of TriggerCandProducer
(near line#202)std::vector<std::string> filters = hltConfig_.moduleLabels( hltTag_.label() );, modify it as:
try { std::vector<std::string> filters = hltConfig_.moduleLabels( hltTag_.label() ); } catch (...){ std::cout << "Trigger is not in the setup "<< hltTag_.label() << std::endl; }
probe_sc_abseta
, which is not available in present Electron_TagProbeTreeProducer_cfg.py
, edit the modified NewElectron_TagProbeTreeProducer_cfg.py
. In this file, there is module named ProbeVariablesToStore
, add therein the new variable asprobe_sc_abseta = cms.string("abs(superCluster.eta)"),
NewElectron_TagProbeTreeProducer_cfg.py
: process.PassingId
or process.PassingId80
attribute of the process, modify the required variables, and pass the required modified InputProducer
to the process process.PassingHLT
. process.PassingHLT = cms.EDProducer("trgMatchedGsfElectronProducer", InputProducer = cms.InputTag("PassingId80"), hltTag = cms.untracked.InputTag(HLTPath,"","HLT"), triggerEventTag = cms.untracked.InputTag("hltTriggerSummaryAOD","","HLT") )
process.tagId80 = cms.EDProducer("CandViewShallowCloneCombiner", decay = cms.string("Tag PassingId80"), # charge coniugate states are implied checkCharge = cms.bool(False), cut = cms.string("60 < mass < 120"), )and add
process.tagId80
to a sequence named process.allTagsAndProbes
.
process.IdToHLT
, edit it as:process.Id80ToHLT = cms.EDAnalyzer("TagProbeFitTreeProducer", mcTruthCommonStuff, CommonStuffForGsfElectronProbe, tagProbePairs = cms.InputTag("tagId80"), arbitration = cms.string("Random2"), flags = cms.PSet( probe_passing = cms.InputTag("PassingHLT"), probe_passingId80 = cms.InputTag("PassingId80") ), probeMatches = cms.InputTag("McMatchId"), allProbes = cms.InputTag("PassingId80") ) process.Id80ToHLT.variables.probe_dRjet = cms.InputTag("GsfDRToNearestJet") process.Id80ToHLT.variables.probe_nJets = cms.InputTag("JetMultiplicityInGsfEvents")and add
process.Id80ToHLT
to a sequence named process.tree_sequence
.
testTagProbeFitTreeAnalyzer_Zee.py
. (Currently we are supplying these modifications ready-made in mytestTagProbeFitTreeAnalyzer_Zee.py
) Variables
as they appear in input probe tree variables like:Variables = cms.PSet( mass = cms.vstring("Tag-Probe Mass", "60.0", "120.0", "GeV/c^{2}"), probe_gsfEle_pt = cms.vstring("Probe p_{T}", "0", "1000", "GeV/c"), probe_sc_eta = cms.vstring("Probe #eta", "-2.5", "2.5", "") ),
Categories
like:Categories = cms.PSet( mcTrue = cms.vstring("MC true", "dummy[true=1,false=0]"), probe_passing = cms.vstring("Probe Passing", "dummy[pass=1,fail=0]") ),
Efficiencies
which defines some details of efficiency calculations like:pt_eta = cms.PSet( EfficiencyCategoryAndState = cms.vstring("probe_passing","pass"), UnbinnedVariables = cms.vstring("mass"), BinnedVariables = cms.PSet( probe_gsfEle_pt = cms.vdouble(20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110,120), probe_sc_eta = cms.vdouble(-2.4,-1.2, 0.0, 1.2, 2.4) ), BinToPDFmap = cms.vstring("gaussPlusLinear") ),, herein,
EfficiencyCategoryAndState
and BinnedVariables
parameters are modifies as the input file requirements.
Tight- without PU-rew | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pT | 10 - 15 | 15 - 20 | 20 - 30 | 30 - 40 | 40 - 50 | 50 - 200 |
0.0 < abs(η) < 0.8 | 0.838 + 0.024- 0.024 ± 0.043 | 0.942 + 0.011- 0.011 ± 0.045 | 0.980 + 0.003- 0.001 ± 0.002 | 0.982 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.002 | 0.985 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.984 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 |
0.8 < abs(η) < 1.442 | 0.861 + 0.024- 0.024 ± 0.025 | 0.925 + 0.013- 0.012 ± 0.008 | 0.955 + 0.004- 0.004 ± 0.005 | 0.965 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.005 | 0.974 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.978 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.004 |
1.442 < abs(η) < 1.556 | 1.021 + 0.110- 0.101 ± 0.205 | 0.889 + 0.041- 0.040 ± 0.049 | 0.996 + 0.018- 0.018 ± 0.013 | 0.989 + 0.008- 0.008 ± 0.002 | 0.961 + 0.004- 0.004 ± 0.002 | 0.982 + 0.007- 0.007 ± 0.005 |
1.556 < abs(η) < 2.0 | 0.951 + 0.054- 0.053 ± 0.032 | 0.932 + 0.025- 0.024 ± 0.020 | 0.970 + 0.008- 0.008 ± 0.008 | 0.968 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.002 | 0.989 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.002 | 0.991 + 0.004- 0.004 ± 0.005 |
2.0 < abs(η) < 2.5 | 1.055 + 0.056- 0.054 ± 0.029 | 0.984 + 0.025- 0.024 ± 0.029 | 1.027 + 0.008- 0.008 ± 0.006 | 1.018 + 0.004- 0.002 ± 0.001 | 1.012 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.002 | 1.008 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.001 |
Tight- PU-rew | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pT | 10 - 15 | 15 - 20 | 20 - 30 | 30 - 40 | 40 - 50 | 50 - 200 |
0.0 < abs(η) < 0.8 | 0.818 + 0.023- 0.023 ± 0.042 | 0.928 + 0.010- 0.010 ± 0.044 | 0.973 + 0.003- 0.001 ± 0.002 | 0.979 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.002 | 0.984 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.000 | 0.983 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.000 |
0.8 < abs(η) < 1.442 | 0.840 + 0.023- 0.023 ± 0.024 | 0.914 + 0.012- 0.012 ± 0.008 | 0.948 + 0.004- 0.004 ± 0.005 | 0.961 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.005 | 0.972 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.977 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.004 |
1.442 < abs(η) < 1.556 | 1.008 + 0.108- 0.099 ± 0.203 | 0.877 + 0.040- 0.039 ± 0.049 | 0.983 + 0.018- 0.018 ± 0.003 | 0.983 + 0.008- 0.008 ± 0.002 | 0.957 + 0.004- 0.004 ± 0.000 | 0.978 + 0.007- 0.007 ± 0.004 |
1.556 < abs(η) < 2.0 | 0.906 + 0.051- 0.050 ± 0.031 | 0.907 + 0.024- 0.023 ± 0.019 | 0.957 + 0.007- 0.007 ± 0.008 | 0.962 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.002 | 0.985 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.986 + 0.004- 0.004 ± 0.001 |
2.0 < abs(η) < 2.5 | 0.991 + 0.051- 0.050 ± 0.027 | 0.939 + 0.023- 0.023 ± 0.037 | 1.001 + 0.008- 0.008 ± 0.006 | 1.002 + 0.004- 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.999 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.002 | 0.995 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.001 |
Medium - no PU rew | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pT | 10 - 15 | 15 - 20 | 20 - 30 | 30 - 40 | 40 - 50 | 50 - 200 |
0.0 < abs(η) < 0.8 | 0.882+ 0.024- 0.023 ± 0.041 | 0.974 + 0.010- 0.010 ± 0.032 | 1.010 + 0.003- 0.003± 0.003 | 1.006 + 0.001- 0.001± 0.000 | 1.009 + 0.001- 0.001± 0.001 | 1.008 + 0.002- 0.001± 0.002 |
0.8 < abs(η) < 1.442 | 0.968 + 0.026- 0.025 ± 0.073 | 0.962 + 0.011- 0.011 ± 0.031 | 0.981 + 0.011- 0.014± 0.006 | 0.987 + 0.001- 0.001± 0.000 | 0.993 + 0.001- 0.001± 0.001 | 0.995 + 0.002- 0.001± 0.001 |
1.442 < abs(η) < 1.556 | 1.118 + 0.127- 0.114 ± 0.162 | 0.992 + 0.051- 0.050 ± 0.044 | 1.046 + 0.016- 0.015± 0.003 | 1.011 + 0.007- 0.007± 0.001 | 0.994 + 0.003- 0.003± 0.002 | 0.997 + 0.006- 0.006± 0.002 |
1.556 < abs(η) < 2.0 | 0.946 + 0.049- 0.047 ± 0.043 | 0.996 + 0.021- 0.020 ± 0.006 | 0.992 + 0.006- 0.006± 0.009 | 0.993 + 0.003- 0.003± 0.000 | 1.008 + 0.002- 0.001± 0.000 | 1.009 + 0.003- 0.003± 0.000 |
2.0 < abs(η) < 2.5 | 1.121 + 0.025- 0.025 ± 0.015 | 1.004 + 0.020- 0.020 ± 0.018 | 1.045 + 0.006- 0.006± 0.005 | 1.031 + 0.003- 0.003± 0.000 | 1.019 + 0.001- 0.001± 0.000 | 1.014 + 0.002- 0.002± 0.001 |
Medium - PU rew | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pT | 10 - 15 | 15 - 20 | 20 - 30 | 30 - 40 | 40 - 50 | 50 - 200 |
0.0 < abs(η) < 0.8 | 0.859 + 0.023- 0.023 ± 0.040 | 0.962 + 0.010- 0.010 ± 0.032 | 1.004 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.003 | 1.003 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.002 | 1.007 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 1.007 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.002 |
0.8 < abs(η) < 1.442 | 0.942 + 0.025- 0.025 ± 0.071 | 0.951 + 0.011- 0.011 ± 0.030 | 0.975 + 0.011- 0.013 ± 0.006 | 0.984 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.992 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.995 + 0.002- 0.001 ± 0.001 |
1.442 < abs(η) < 1.556 | 1.099 + 0.125- 0.112 ± 0.160 | 0.975 + 0.050- 0.048 ± 0.043 | 1.034 + 0.015- 0.014 ± 0.003 | 1.006 + 0.007- 0.007 ± 0.002 | 0.991 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.004 | 0.993 + 0.005- 0.005 ± 0.002 |
1.556 < abs(η) < 2.0 | 0.908 + 0.046- 0.045 ± 0.041 | 0.972 + 0.020- 0.020 ± 0.006 | 0.983 + 0.006- 0.006 ± 0.009 | 0.990 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.001 | 1.006 + 0.002- 0.001 ± 0.002 | 1.007 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.000 |
2.0 < abs(η) < 2.5 | 1.050 + 0.022- 0.022 ± 0.014 | 0.963 + 0.019- 0.019 ± 0.017 | 1.025 + 0.006- 0.006 ± 0.005 | 1.022 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.002 | 1.013 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.003 | 1.009 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.001 |
Loose - no PU rew | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pT | 10 - 15 | 15 - 20 | 20 - 30 | 30 - 40 | 40 - 50 | 50 - 200 |
0.0 < abs(η) < 0.8 | 0.877 + 0.023- 0.023 ± 0.042 | 0.974 + 0.010- 0.010 ± 0.037 | 1.011 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.003 | 1.006 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.002 | 1.009 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 1.009 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 |
0.8 < abs(η) < 1.442 | 0.878 + 0.021- 0.020 ± 0.056 | 0.973 + 0.011- 0.011 ± 0.023 | 0.988 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.007 | 0.993 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.995 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.999 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.002 |
1.442 < abs(η) < 1.556 | 1.124 + 0.126- 0.110 ± 0.135 | 0.913 + 0.031- 0.031 ± 0.018 | 1.056 + 0.011- 0.013 ± 0.008 | 1.003 + 0.004- 0.004 ± 0.002 | 0.990 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.004 | 0.998 + 0.005- 0.005 ± 0.002 |
1.556 < abs(η) < 2.0 | 0.869 + 0.017- 0.017 ± 0.026 | 0.960 + 0.018- 0.018 ± 0.029 | 0.989 + 0.005- 0.005 ± 0.005 | 0.995 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.001 | 1.005 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.001 | 1.007 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.001 |
2.0 < abs(η) < 2.5 | 1.104 + 0.046- 0.045 ± 0.062 | 1.009 + 0.019- 0.019 ± 0.047 | 1.035 + 0.006- 0.006 ± 0.003 | 1.027 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.001 | 1.010 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.009 | 1.012 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.002 |
Loose - PU rew | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pT | 10 - 15 | 15 - 20 | 20 - 30 | 30 - 40 | 40 - 50 | 50 - 200 |
0.0 < abs(η) < 0.8 | 0.855 + 0.023- 0.022 ± 0.041 | 0.962 + 0.010- 0.010 ± 0.037 | 1.005 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.003 | 1.004 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.002 | 1.008 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 1.008 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 |
0.8 < abs(η) < 1.442 | 0.858 + 0.020- 0.020 ± 0.055 | 0.962 + 0.011- 0.011 ± 0.009 | 0.981 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.004 | 0.991 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.000 | 0.994 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.999 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.002 |
1.442 < abs(η) < 1.556 | 1.109 + 0.124- 0.108 ± 0.133 | 0.903 + 0.031- 0.030 ± 0.018 | 1.044 + 0.011- 0.013 ± 0.008 | 0.998 + 0.004- 0.004 ± 0.002 | 0.989 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.004 | 0.994 + 0.004- 0.005 ± 0.002 |
1.556 < abs(η) < 2.0 | 0.838 + 0.016- 0.016 ± 0.025 | 0.939 + 0.018- 0.018 ± 0.028 | 0.980 + 0.005- 0.005 ± 0.005 | 0.992 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.001 | 1.004 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.001 | 1.006 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.001 |
2.0 < abs(η) < 2.5 | 1.034 + 0.043- 0.042 ± 0.058 | 0.970 + 0.018- 0.018 ± 0.045 | 1.017 + 0.006- 0.006 ± 0.003 | 1.019 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.001 | 1.005 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.009 | 1.009 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.002 |
Veto - no PU rew | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pT | 10 - 15 | 15 - 20 | 20 - 30 | 30 - 40 | 40 - 50 | 50 - 200 |
0.0 < abs(η) < 0.8 | 0.870 + 0.023- 0.023 ± 0.034 | 0.968 + 0.010- 0.010 ± 0.024 | 1.012 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.004 | 1.009 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.002 | 1.009 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 1.009 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 |
0.8 < abs(η) < 1.442 | 0.865 + 0.020- 0.020 ± 0.063 | 0.970 + 0.011- 0.011 ± 0.024 | 0.990 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.007 | 0.993 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.992 + 0.000- 0.001 ± 0.004 | 0.997 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 |
1.442 < abs(η) < 1.556 | 1.097 + 0.127- 0.109 ± 0.133 | 1.025 + 0.047- 0.044 ± 0.079 | 1.047 + 0.009- 0.009 ± 0.011 | 1.001 + 0.004- 0.003 ± 0.002 | 0.988 + 0.004- 0.004 ± 0.004 | 1.004 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.003 |
1.556 < abs(η) < 2.0 | 0.959 + 0.042- 0.041 ± 0.054 | 0.990 + 0.017- 0.017 ± 0.037 | 0.975 + 0.005- 0.005 ± 0.003 | 0.989 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.996 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.996 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.001 |
2.0 < abs(η) < 2.5 | 0.981 + 0.041- 0.039 ± 0.055 | 1.009 + 0.016- 0.016 ± 0.021 | 1.016 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.003 | 1.008 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.001 | 1.004 + 0.001- 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.999 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.001 |
Veto - PU rew | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pT | 10 - 15 | 15 - 20 | 20 - 30 | 30 - 40 | 40 - 50 | 50 - 200 |
0.0 < abs(η) < 0.8 | 0.850 + 0.022- 0.022 ± 0.033 | 0.956 + 0.009- 0.009 ± 0.024 | 1.007 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.003 | 1.006 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.002 | 1.008 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 1.008 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 |
0.8 < abs(η) < 1.442 | 0.846 + 0.020- 0.019 ± 0.062 | 0.959 + 0.011- 0.011 ± 0.023 | 0.984 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.007 | 0.991 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.991 + 0.000- 0.001 ± 0.004 | 0.997 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 |
1.442 < abs(η) < 1.556 | 1.082 + 0.125- 0.107 ± 0.131 | 1.017 + 0.046- 0.044 ± 0.079 | 1.038 + 0.009- 0.009 ± 0.011 | 0.997 + 0.004- 0.003 ± 0.002 | 0.986 + 0.004- 0.004 ± 0.004 | 1.002 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.003 |
1.556 < abs(η) < 2.0 | 0.930 + 0.041- 0.040 ± 0.052 | 0.972 + 0.017- 0.017 ± 0.036 | 0.966 + 0.005- 0.005 ± 0.003 | 0.985 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.994 + 0.001- 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.995 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.001 |
2.0 < abs(η) < 2.5 | 0.919 + 0.038- 0.037 ± 0.051 | 0.975 + 0.015- 0.015 ± 0.020 | 0.999 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.003 | 1.000 + 0.002- 0.002 ± 0.000 | 0.998 + 0.001- 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.994 + 0.003- 0.003 ± 0.001 |
I | Attachment | History | Action | Size | Date | Who | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
gif | Ele15ID95ProbeEta.gif | r1 | manage | 8.2 K | 2010-09-15 - 07:56 | LovedeepKaurSaini |