next up previous
Next: Muon decay channel Up: TOSCA Letter of Intent Previous: Scan back strategy

Sensitivity and background

 

The sensitivity to the  oscillation signal and the background estimation are shown separately for the following single charged particle decay modes of :

Charged current interactions of  can be selected on the basis of their characteristic topology in 1-prong decay channels. The basic selection is a decay vertex at a distance greater than 20 and less than 3.5 mm from the neutrino interaction vertex, one negatively charged track from this secondary vertex that gives rise to a kink angle greater that 10 mrad and no identified muon or electron at the primary vertex.

The three-prong decay , with a branching ratio of about 14%, can further improve the efficiency of detection. Efficiency and background studies are under way in order to estimate the additional contribution to the sensitivity.

The decays of and produced in NC and CC neutrino interactions can simulate the 1-prong topology. They can be easily removed by requiring the transverse momentum of the candidate's charged daughter relative to the parent direction, , to be greater than 250 MeV/c. After this cut the remaining background sources are:

  1. the prompt contamination in the beam;
  2. one-prong decays of charm antiparticles;
  3. hadrons that scatter in the emulsion with no visible additional activity, the so-called white kinks.

A preselection, needed to reconstruct the event and determine the charge of the decay daughter, and kink detection cuts affect in a different way both signal and background as is shown in Tab. 234567.

In order to enhance the signal to noise ratio, kinematical analysis at the primary and decay vertices, which exploit both the space resolution of the emulsion and the full spectrometry of the event, are exploited. These reduce the background from charm and white kinks. This analysis needs only to be performed for candidate events.

  
Figure 15: Energy spectra for interacting neutrinos: (a) prompt; (b) from oscillation ( ).

Prompt interactions and the oscillation signal have different energy spectra, as can be seen in Fig. 15, where the candidate spectrum is approximated by the   spectrum gif. The difference between the spectra is more significant at low , as the  from oscillation becomes softer, thus allowing a more powerful discrimination. In the following all efficiencies will be computed in the hypothesis of large .




next up previous
Next: Muon decay channel Up: TOSCA Letter of Intent Previous: Scan back strategy